Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:23:07 +1000 | From | Peter Williams <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: Rationalize sys_sched_rr_get_interval() |
| |
Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On 16-10-2007 03:16, Peter Williams wrote: > ... >> I'd suggest that we modify sched_rr_get_interval() to return -EINVAL >> (with *interval set to zero) if the target task is not SCHED_RR. That >> way we can save a lot of unnecessary code. I'll work on a patch. > ... > > I like this idea! But, since this a system call maybe at least > something like RFC would be nicer...
We would be just modifying the code to meet that specification so a patch would be OK. Anyone who wants to comment will do so anyway :-).
> >>> Sorry for too harsh words. >> I didn't consider them harsh. > > So, I can't be mistaken for a rapper yet? I'll work on it... > > Cheers, > Jarek P. > > PS: Peter, for some unknown reason I don't receive your messages. > If you get back some errors from my side I'd be interested to see > it (alternative: jarkao2 at gmail.com).
I haven't seen any bounce notifications. I've added the qmail address as a CC.
Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |