Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:50:36 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.20.21 review 12/35] TCP: Fix TCP handling of SACK in bidirectional flows. |
| |
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 07:22:14PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: >... > Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it. In fact, I've reviewed them > four, but two of them did not apply and the code looked somewhat different, > so I considered them irrelevant to 2.6.20. I didn't understand that they > were all related, so maybe I checked them in a wrong order. > > I'll recheck all that in the right sequence and will merge them four, or > get back to you if something still puzzles me.
I discussed this issue with Ilpo just yesterday regarding 2.6.16, and the result of our discussion was that I reverted it.
TCP being in some situations a bit more conservative than it should be isn't a big issue and not worth backporting with a risk of introducing a regression.
I'd recommend you simply drop the two patches for 2.6.20.
> Thanks! > Willy
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |