lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: coding for optimizations (Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change)
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:26:09PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:14:29AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> []
> > It's also a quite ill idea to think about whether gcc might produce a
> > few bytes more or less code at the if when there's such a long printk()
> > in the middle...
>
> printk() problem was discussed with proper banana userspace replacement
> proposition by me, so i don't care much.
>
> Though, why MCE can't be enabled/disabled by config option? Native
> engineers from proper company should know what processors have this
> feature... If kconfig isn't flexible for this, i'm glad to hear
> opinions. If it's needed anyway, then sorry.

You should better say sorry for not having checked that it can already
be disabled with a kconfig option...

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-11 17:23    [W:0.065 / U:3.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site