[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:58:19AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > Subject : BUG: at mm/truncate.c:60 cancel_dirty_page() (reiserfs)
> > References :
> > Submitter : Malte Schröder <>
> > Status : unknown
> Adrian, this is also available as

The latter was in my list as:

Subject : BUG: at mm/truncate.c:60 cancel_dirty_page() (XFS)
References :
Submitter : Sami Farin <>
Handled-By : David Chinner <>
Patch :
Status : patch available

> So I think this does show some confusion in reiserfs, but it's not
> anything new. The only new thing is that the _message_ happens.
> So I don't personally consider this a regression. Just a sign of old and
> preexisting confusion that is now uncovered by new code (and it will print
> out the scary message at most four times, and then stop complaining about
> it. So apart from the scary message, nothing new and bad has really
> happened).

At least the printing of scary messages is a regression.

Unless we want to be buried in bug reports after 2.6.20 got released,
the minimum fix is to temporarily remove the WARN_ON().

> Linus



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-09 22:07    [W:0.095 / U:7.516 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site