[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Finding hardlinks
    On Fri 2007-01-05 16:15:41, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
    > > > And does it matter? If you rename a file, tar might skip it no matter of
    > > > hardlink detection (if readdir races with rename, you can read none of the
    > > > names of file, one or both --- all these are possible).
    > > >
    > > > If you have "dir1/a" hardlinked to "dir1/b" and while tar runs you delete
    > > > both "a" and "b" and create totally new files "dir2/c" linked to "dir2/d",
    > > > tar might hardlink both "c" and "d" to "a" and "b".
    > > >
    > > > No one guarantees you sane result of tar or cp -a while changing the tree.
    > > > I don't see how is_samefile() could make it worse.
    > >
    > > There are several cases where changing the tree doesn't affect the
    > > correctness of the tar or cp -a result. In some of these cases using
    > > samefile() instead of st_ino _will_ result in a corrupted result.
    > Also note, that using st_ino in combination with samefile() doesn't
    > make the result much better, it eliminates false positives, but cannot
    > fix false negatives.

    I'd argue false negatives are not as severe.
    (cesky, pictures)
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-08 12:29    [W:0.024 / U:7.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site