lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] KVM paravirtualization for Linux

* Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:

> Looks like a lot of complexity for very little gain. I'm not sure
> what the vmwrite cost is, cut it can't be that high compared to
> vmexit.

while i disagree with characterising one extra parameter passed down
plus one extra branch as 'a lot of complexity', i agree that making the
flush a NOP on VMX is even better. (if it's possible without breaking
future hardware) I guess you are right that the only true cost here is
the vmwrite cost, and that there's no impact on CR3 flushing (because it
happens unconditionally). Forget about this patch.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-08 10:51    [W:0.038 / U:22.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site