lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH] include/linux/slab.h: new KFREE() macro.
Date
> Any strong reason why not? x has some value that does not 
> make sense and can create only problems.

By the same logic, you should memset the buffer to zero before freeing it too.

> And as I explained, it can result in longer code too. So, why
> keep this value around. Why not re-initialize it to NULL.

Because initialization increases code size.

It's a silly patch.

> If x should not be re-initialized to NULL, then by the same
> logic, we should not even initialize local variables. And all
> of us know that local variables should be initialized.
>
> I would like to know a good reason as to why x should not be
> set to NULL.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-08 08:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans