[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [nfsv4] RE: Finding hardlinks
    On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 12:04 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
    > I agree that the way the client implements its cache is out of the protocol
    > scope. But how do you interpret "correct behavior" in section 4.2.1?
    > "Clients MUST use filehandle comparisons only to improve performance, not for correct behavior. All clients need to be prepared for situations in which it cannot be determined whether two filehandles denote the same object and in such cases, avoid making invalid assumptions which might cause incorrect behavior."
    > Don't you consider data corruption due to cache inconsistency an incorrect behavior?

    Exactly where do you see us violating the close-to-open cache
    consistency guarantees?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-04 11:51    [W:0.021 / U:0.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site