[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: How many people are using 2.6.16?
    On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > The issue was somewhat confused by people certainly *reporting* it for
    > > older kernels. Also, as part of the dirty bit cleanups and sanity
    > > checkingwe did actually seem to fix a long-standing CIFS corruption (and
    > > apparently reisertfs/XFS problems too).
    > >
    > > But the *common* case was actually introduced with 2.6.19, and 2.6.16
    > > wouldn't be affected.
    > Thanks for the clarifications.
    > Regarding the longstanding CIFS/reiserfs/XFS problems, it seems the
    > status is:
    > XFS:
    > fix not yet in your tree

    With the WARN_ON() in cancel_dirty_page() removed:;a=commitdiff;h=ecdfc9787fe527491baefc22dce8b2dbd5b2908d

    XFS will behave exactly the same as 2.6.19 and previous releases.
    The patches I sent were only ever really workarounds to greatly
    reduce the race window that could lead to the warning being

    We really need Nick Piggin's invalidate/truncate/mmap race fixes to
    properly solve the XFS issues uncovered by Linus' changes. Given
    that we haven't had any reported cases of data corruption on XFS
    (and I couldn't trigger any even when seeing the warnings) I think
    we are fairly safe just maintaining the status quo and waiting the
    right fix to make it's way into the tree....


    Dave Chinner
    Principal Engineer
    SGI Australian Software Group
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-31 12:55    [W:12.977 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site