[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/23] clocksource: drop duplicate register checking
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 10:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <> wrote:
> > This is something Thomas already dropped, [...]
> (i think you forgot to Cc: Thomas here, nor is this something that
> Thomas' change dropped.)

Yes your right .

> > [...] and I'm just sticking with that .. If you register your
> > clocksource _twice_ your kernel will likely not work correctly (and
> > might crash).
> this is a quite bad change. John's original clocksource code protects
> against double registry:
> if (is_registered_source(c)) {
> printk("register_clocksource: Cannot register %s. "
> "Already registered!", c->name);
> ret = -EBUSY;
> and Thomas' change keeps that property, but doesnt printk. Your change
> makes double registry possible, potentially crashing the kernel later
> on! (And this isnt theoretical, double registry did happen in practice
> when i debugged suspend problems on my SMP laptop.)

My original patch set makes the duplicate register checking better
(which I dropped) .. I'll be happy to reintroduce that part of it..


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-31 16:17    [W:0.146 / U:1.572 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site