lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sysctl selinux: Don't look at table->de
Date
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 05:43, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> True, but a system that disables proc is likely a system with a custom
> policy anyway,

In practice we have to extensively customise policy long before getting to the
non-proc stage of optimising for small hardware. The Familiar distribution
(used on the iPaQ) has /proc but needs significant policy changes when
compared to a typical Fedora workstation. Not only is there the issue that
embedded distributions have different daemons and path names to workstations,
but the memory constraints mean that even a modular targeted policy is not as
small as you desire.

> and dependency on proc is fairly basic to selinux these
> days (due to reliance on /proc/self/attr for process attribute
> manipulation in place of the old selinux syscalls).  Possibly we should
> just make selinux depend on proc and drop the #ifdef there.

I think that is the correct thing to do. Someone who is prepared to do all
the work needed to get a recent SE Linux system operating without /proc will
have no problem changing the kernel config scripts and everyone else would be
better off not being confused by being offered sets of options that are not
viable.

--
russell@coker.com.au
http://etbe.blogspot.com/ My Blog

http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-30 09:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans