[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sysctl selinux: Don't look at table->de
    On Tuesday 30 January 2007 05:43, Stephen Smalley <> wrote:
    > True, but a system that disables proc is likely a system with a custom
    > policy anyway,

    In practice we have to extensively customise policy long before getting to the
    non-proc stage of optimising for small hardware. The Familiar distribution
    (used on the iPaQ) has /proc but needs significant policy changes when
    compared to a typical Fedora workstation. Not only is there the issue that
    embedded distributions have different daemons and path names to workstations,
    but the memory constraints mean that even a modular targeted policy is not as
    small as you desire.

    > and dependency on proc is fairly basic to selinux these
    > days (due to reliance on /proc/self/attr for process attribute
    > manipulation in place of the old selinux syscalls).  Possibly we should
    > just make selinux depend on proc and drop the #ifdef there.

    I think that is the correct thing to do. Someone who is prepared to do all
    the work needed to get a recent SE Linux system operating without /proc will
    have no problem changing the kernel config scripts and everyone else would be
    better off not being confused by being offered sets of options that are not

    -- My Blog Sponsoring Free Software development

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-30 09:39    [W:0.023 / U:17.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site