[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit

    Jes Sorensen wrote:
    > Greg Ungerer wrote:
    >> Dave Jones wrote:
    >>> Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or
    >>> sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented.
    >> Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k
    >> for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much
    >> contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion.
    > Which is good, provided that non-mmu work is actively driving some of
    > the decisions in mainline. Given that I don't follow the non-mmu work
    > at all, I don't have a feel for whether that is the case, but I could
    > imagine that it would have some impact that needs to be taken into
    > account at times.


    > My worry is for spending time and slots on things /
    > people dealing with classic architectures which are no longer being
    > manufactured and are only being maintained in catch-up mode.

    Agreed, but I haven't seen that in the past. The CPU panel at least
    has always covered current (and future) hardware.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-31 01:13    [W:0.045 / U:45.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site