Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:09:56 +1000 | From | Greg Ungerer <> | Subject | Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit |
| |
Jes Sorensen wrote: > Greg Ungerer wrote: >> Dave Jones wrote: >>> Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or >>> sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented. >> >> Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k >> for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much >> contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion. > > Which is good, provided that non-mmu work is actively driving some of > the decisions in mainline. Given that I don't follow the non-mmu work > at all, I don't have a feel for whether that is the case, but I could > imagine that it would have some impact that needs to be taken into > account at times.
Exactly.
> My worry is for spending time and slots on things / > people dealing with classic architectures which are no longer being > manufactured and are only being maintained in catch-up mode.
Agreed, but I haven't seen that in the past. The CPU panel at least has always covered current (and future) hardware.
Regards Greg
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |