[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Bug: 2.6.15 Process accounting fails to account for small time slice loads (still)
Hi Tim.

That would be great if you could find that patch - I can worry about
porting it to the current kernel. We're having an issue where our
device, while routing large amounts of network traffic, reports 0% CPU
utilisation when it cannot be the case, and I think this is the cause.

Tom Burns

On 1/30/07, Tim Schmielau <> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Tom Burns wrote:
> > The bug described back in 2004 in the following message still seems to exist:
> >
> >
> >
> > Essentially, it appears that if a process sleeps before it uses up a
> > complete jiffy then no charge is made to its process accounting table.
> That's not a bug, it's a feature. ;-)
> More seriously, it's a design decision. The benefit of exactly correct
> micro bookkeeping does not seem to warrant the extra cost in terms of cpu
> cycles spent in the accounting code.
> IIRC there was a patch for that some years ago, if you are interested I
> will try to find it. No idea how much work it would be to port it to
> current kernels, though.
> Tim
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-30 19:59    [W:0.060 / U:1.000 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site