lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Don't allow the stack to grow into hugetlb reserved regions
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Ken Chen wrote:
>
> For ia64, the hugetlb address region is reserved at the top of user
> space address. Stacks are below that region. Throw in the mix, we
> have two stacks, one memory stack that grows down and one register
> stack backing store that grows up. These two stacks are always in
> pair and grow towards each other. And lastly, we have virtual address
> holes in between regions. It's just impossible to grow any of these
> two stacks into hugetlb region no matter how I played it.
>
> So, AFAICS this bug doesn't apply to ia64 (and certainly not x86). The
> new check of is_hugepage_only_range() is really a noop for both arches.

Certainly not a problem on x86.

But, never mind hugetlb, you still not quite convinced me that there's
no problem at all with get_user_pages find_extend_vma growing on ia64.

I repeat that ia64_do_page_fault has REGION tests to guard against
expanding either kind of stack across into another region. ia64_brk,
ia64_mmap_check and arch_get_unmapped_area have RGN_MAP_LIMIT checks.
But where is the equivalent paranoia when ptrace calls get_user_pages
calls find_extend_vma?

If your usual stacks face each other across the same region, they're
not going to pose problem. But what if someone mmaps MAP_GROWSDOWN
near the base of a region, then uses ptrace to touch an address near
the top of the region below?

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-29 18:29    [W:5.719 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site