Messages in this thread | | | From | Rob Landley <> | Subject | Re: sed _s_gnu_alternatives_ (Re: [rft] (g)awk substitution) | Date | Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:03:32 -0500 |
| |
On Thursday 25 January 2007 4:40 am, Oleg Verych wrote: > > Your objection is a bit like saying "and don't use cat". I'm saying don't > > call cat "gcat" when you just mean plain old cat. > > No it's not, really. I don't want to see pipes, fork()s, disk seek, > when task can be done without it. I know, what awk is, and i hope it > will have its better time.
*shrug* Making the need for "gawk" go away was my goal, and gawk->awk was the minimal change. If you want more than that, I'm not objecting, just not personally interested.
I believe "shift 5" is also SUSv3. :)
Rob -- "Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |