lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/10] local_t : powerpc
Mathieu Desnoyers writes:

> +static __inline__ int local_dec_if_positive(local_t *l)
> +{
> + int t;
> +
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> +"1: lwarx %0,0,%1 # local_dec_if_positive\n\
> + addic. %0,%0,-1\n\
> + blt- 2f\n"
> + PPC405_ERR77(0,%1)
> +" stwcx. %0,0,%1\n\
> + bne- 1b"

This has the same bugs that we fixed recently in atomic_dec_if_positive;
first, on 64-bit machines, the lwarx will zero-extend the word loaded
from memory, and so the result of the addic will be negative only if
the word was originally 0. Secondly, even on 32-bit machines,
0x80000000 will be considered positive since decrementing it gives
0x7fffffff, which is positive.

> +/* Use these for per-cpu local_t variables: on some archs they are
> + * much more efficient than these naive implementations. Note they take
> + * a variable, not an address.
> + *
> + * This could be done better if we moved the per cpu data directly
> + * after GS.
> + */

What's "GS"? Does this comment really apply on powerpc?

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-24 11:35    [W:0.146 / U:1.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site