[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.

On Jan 2 2007 10:01, Mark Lord wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>> > But surely one of (not sure which) sync+async or async+sync may also
>> > be okay?
>> > Or would it?
>> Async merge to sync request should be ok. But I wonder what happens with
>> hdparm, since it seems to trigger one of these tests. Very puzzling.
>> I'll dive in and take a look.
> The code (written 10 years ago) isn't the best in the world,
> and will be redone entirely for hdparm-7.0 this year.
> But right now, it essentially does this:
> loop:
> seek( to sector zero );
> read( 2MBytes );
> repeat loop for 3 seconds

Well for pure reading speed, I already use dd_rescue -d /dev/hda /dev/null
Gives the same as hdparm -t when acting on uncached data.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-02 18:17    [W:0.053 / U:37.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site