[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] pci_bus conversion to struct device
    On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Martin Mares wrote:
    > Hello!
    > > I recommend we just delete the pci_bus class. I don't think it serves
    > > any useful purpose. The bridge can be inferred frmo the sysfs hierarchy
    > > (not to mention lspci will tell you). The cpuaffinity file should be
    > > moved from the bus to the device -- it really doesn't make any sense to
    > > talk about which cpu a bus is affine to, only a device.
    > It doesn't seem to serve any useful purpose other than the affinity now,
    > but I still think that it conceptually belongs there, because it makes
    > sense to have per-bus attributes. For example, in the future we could
    > show data width and signalling speed.

    Other per bus attributes might be address routing, VGA routing enabled,
    Fast-back-to-back enabled. PCI-X bridges and PCI-e bridges might also
    advertise data related to MMRBC and similar onboard buffer mgt behaviors.

    ISTR, IBM PCI-X bridge works better with 512 "block" (data xfer size)
    than larger sizes becuase it internally allocates buffer space
    in 512B chunks. It would be useful to know along with downstream
    device MMRBC. Not sure this all has to come from /sys though.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-19 08:17    [W:0.023 / U:21.544 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site