Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control | From | Trond Myklebust <> | Date | Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:45:15 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 15:29 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I was thinking that since the server needs to actually sync the page a > commit might be quite expensive (timewise), hence I didn't want to flush > too much, and interleave them with writing out some real pages to > utilise bandwidth.
Most servers just call fsync()/fdatasync() whenever we send a COMMIT, in which case the extra round trips are just adding unnecessary latency.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |