[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/59] Cleanup sysctl
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> I think it would be fair to say that if they're not in <linux/sysctl.h> they're
>> not architectural, but that doesn't resolve the counterpositive (are there
>> sysctls in <linux/sysctl.h> which aren't architectural? From the looks of it, I
>> would say yes.) Non-architectural sysctl numbers should not be exported to
>> userspace, and should eventually be rejected by sys_sysctl.
> This last bit doesn't make much sense. I believe you are saying all sysctl
> numbers should be per architecture.

With "architectural" I mean "guaranteed to be stable" (as opposed to
"incidental"). Sorry for the confusion.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-16 20:15    [W:0.134 / U:3.156 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site