lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.20-rc4: usb somehow broken
Date
Am Montag, 15. Januar 2007 17:03 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:

> > Upon further thought, a module parameter won't do as the problem
> > will arise without a driver loaded. A sysfs parameter turns the whole
> > affair into a race condition. Will you set the guard parameter before the
> > autosuspend logic strikes?
> > Unfortunately this leaves only the least attractive solution.
>
> There could be a mixed approach: a builtin blacklist that is extensible
> via a procfs- or sysfs-based interface.

If you want to ask with a lot of bug reports which blacklist was loaded,
then we could.

> Note that we actually have two problems to contend with. Some devices
> must never be autosuspended at all (they disconnect when resuming), and
> others need a reset after resuming.

Do those who can be brought back with a reset need to be listed at all?
Error handling is not a bad idea.

Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-15 17:49    [W:0.048 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site