lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: O_DIRECT question
    Michael Tokarev wrote:
    > Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Viktor wrote:
    >>> OK, madvise() used with mmap'ed file allows to have reads from a file
    >>> with zero-copy between kernel/user buffers and don't pollute cache
    >>> memory unnecessarily. But how about writes? How is to do zero-copy
    >>> writes to a file and don't pollute cache memory without using O_DIRECT?
    >>> Do I miss the appropriate interface?
    >> mmap()+msync() can do that too.
    >
    > It can, somehow... until there's an I/O error. And *that* is just terrbile.

    The other problem besides the inability to handle IO errors is that
    mmap()+msync() is synchronous. You need to go async to keep the
    pipelines full.

    Now if someone wants to implement an aio version of msync and mlock,
    that might do the trick. At least for MMU systems. Non MMU systems
    just can't play mmap type games.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-12 00:27    [W:0.024 / U:59.748 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site