lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: mprotect abuse in slim
On 1/10/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> But since it looks like you just munmap the region now, shouldn't a
> subsequent munmap by the app just return -EINVAL? that seems appropriate
> to me.

Applications don't know about revoke and neither should they.
Therefore close(2) and munmap(2) must work the same way they would for
non-revoked inodes so that applications can release resources
properly.

Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-11 09:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans