[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: mprotect abuse in slim
    On 1/10/07, Serge E. Hallyn <> wrote:
    > But since it looks like you just munmap the region now, shouldn't a
    > subsequent munmap by the app just return -EINVAL? that seems appropriate
    > to me.

    Applications don't know about revoke and neither should they.
    Therefore close(2) and munmap(2) must work the same way they would for
    non-revoked inodes so that applications can release resources

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-11 09:33    [W:0.019 / U:36.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site