lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: mprotect abuse in slim
    On 1/10/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
    > But since it looks like you just munmap the region now, shouldn't a
    > subsequent munmap by the app just return -EINVAL? that seems appropriate
    > to me.

    Applications don't know about revoke and neither should they.
    Therefore close(2) and munmap(2) must work the same way they would for
    non-revoked inodes so that applications can release resources
    properly.

    Pekka
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-11 09:33    [W:0.023 / U:1.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site