[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET 1][PATCH 0/6] Filesystem AIO read/write
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:43:36 +0530
Suparna Bhattacharya <> wrote:

> > The s/lock_page_slow/lock_page_blocking/ got lost. I redid it.
> I thought the lock_page_blocking was an alternative you had suggested
> to the __lock_page vs lock_page_async discussion which got resolved later.
> That is why I didn't make the change in this patchset.
> The call does not block in the async case, hence the choice of
> the _slow suffix (like in fs/buffer.c). But if lock_page_blocking()
> sounds more intuitive to you, that's OK.

I thought people didn't like the "lock_page_slow" name.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-11 06:31    [W:1.712 / U:2.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site