lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCHSET 1][PATCH 0/6] Filesystem AIO read/write
    On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:43:36 +0530
    Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com> wrote:

    > > The s/lock_page_slow/lock_page_blocking/ got lost. I redid it.
    >
    > I thought the lock_page_blocking was an alternative you had suggested
    > to the __lock_page vs lock_page_async discussion which got resolved later.
    > That is why I didn't make the change in this patchset.
    > The call does not block in the async case, hence the choice of
    > the _slow suffix (like in fs/buffer.c). But if lock_page_blocking()
    > sounds more intuitive to you, that's OK.

    I thought people didn't like the "lock_page_slow" name.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-11 06:31    [W:0.021 / U:0.740 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site