[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PATCH - x86-64 signed-compare bug, was Re: select() setting ERESTARTNOHAND (514).
On Thursday 11 January 2007 01:37, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday January 10, wrote:
> >
> > In looking at the Linux code for ERESTARTNOHAND, I see that
> > include/linux/errno.h says this errno should never make it to the user.
> > However, in this instance we ARE seeing it. Looking around on google shows
> > others are seeing it as well, though hits are few.
> ..
> >
> > Thoughts?
> Just a 'me too' at this point.
> The X server on my shiny new notebook (Core 2 Duo) occasionally dies
> with 'select' repeatedly returning ERESTARTNOHAND. It is most
> annoying!

Normally it should be only visible in strace. Did you see it without

> You don't mention in the Email which kernel version you use but I see
> from the web page you reference it is I'm using
> 2.6.18.something.
> I thought I'd have a quick look at the code, comparing i386 to x86-64
> and guess what I found.....
> On x86-64, regs->rax is "unsigned long", so the following is
> needed....

regs->rax is unsigned long.
I don't think your patch will make any difference. What do you think
it will change?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-11 02:17    [W:0.071 / U:0.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site