[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 11:33 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>> I'm afraid we have different understandings of what a "guarantee" is.
> It appears so.
>> Don't we?
>> Guarantee may be one of
>> 1. container will be able to touch that number of pages
>> 2. container will be able to sys_mmap() that number of pages
>> 3. container will not be killed unless it touches that number of pages
> A "death sentence" guarantee? I like it. :)
>> 4. anything else
>> Let's decide what kind of a guarantee we want.

I think of guarantees w.r.t resources as the lower limit on the resource.
Guarantees and limits can be thought of as the range (guarantee, limit]
for the usage of the resource.

> I think of it as: "I will be allowed to use this many total pages, and
> they are guaranteed not to fail." (1), I think. The sum of all of the
> system's guarantees must be less than or equal to the amount of free
> memory on the machine.

Yes, totally agree.

> If we knew to which NUMA node the memory was going to go, we might as
> well take the pages out of the allocator.
> -- Dave

Balbir Singh,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-08 20:31    [W:0.230 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site