lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Jan Kara wrote:
>>
>>> I've been looking more at the code and I have revived my patch fixing
>>> this part of the code. I've mildly tested the patch. Could you also give
>>> it a try? Thanks.
>>>
>>> Honza
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Original commit code assumes, that when a buffer on BJ_SyncData list is
>>> locked,
>>> it is being written to disk. But this is not true and hence it can lead to
>>> a
>>> potential data loss on crash. Also the code didn't count with the fact that
>>> journal_dirty_data() can steal buffers from committing transaction and
>>> hence
>>> could write buffers that no longer belong to the committing transaction.
>>> Finally it could possibly happen that we tried writing out one buffer
>>> several
>>> times.
>>>
>>> The patch below tries to solve these problems by a complete rewrite of the
>>> data
>>> commit code. We go through buffers on t_sync_datalist, lock buffers needing
>>> write out and store them in an array. Buffers are also immediately refiled
>>> to
>>> BJ_Locked list or unfiled (if the write out is completed). When the array
>>> is
>>> full or we have to block on buffer lock, we submit all accumulated buffers
>>> for
>>> IO.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I have been running 4+ hours with this patch and seems to work fine. I
>> haven't hit any
>> assert yet :)
>>
>> I will let it run till tomorrow. I will let you know, how it goes.
>>
> Great, thanks. BTW: Do you have any performance tests handy? The
> changes are big enough to cause some unexpected performance regressions,
> livelocks... If you don't have anything ready, I can setup and run
> something myself. Just that I don't like this testing too much ;).
>
Tests are still running fine.

I don't have any performance tests handy. We have some automated tests I
can schedule
to run to verify the stability aspects.

Thanks,
Badari

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-08 16:39    [W:0.054 / U:10.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site