lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
From
Date
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 14:15 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:
>
> > On Wednesday 06 September 2006 18:55, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>
> >> kexec has been marked experimental for a year now and all
> >> of the serious problems have been worked through. So it
> >> is time (if not past time) to remove the experimental mark.
> >>
> >
> > Hmm, I personally have some doubts it is really not experimental
> > (not because of the kexec code itself, but because of all the other drivers
> > that still break)
>
> That is a reasonable viewpoint. Although by that a lot more of the kernel
> deserves to be marked experimental.
>
> On the perverse side of the sentiment taking off experimental may increase
> our number of testers and get the bugs fixed faster :)

I take it that for using kexec to boot a kdump kernel and then
rebooting the primary kernel that there are a few drivers in
the dumping kernel that wouldn't work but they aren't likely
to be used. Ie: it's "just" a hardware initialization issue
on kernels booted with kexec.

-piet

>
> > But applied for now.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Eric
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Piet Delaney Phone: (408) 200-5256
Blue Lane Technologies Fax: (408) 200-5299
10450 Bubb Rd.
Cupertino, Ca. 95014 Email: piet@bluelane.com
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-07 08:23    [W:0.415 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site