Messages in this thread | | | From | "Stuart MacDonald" <> | Subject | RE: bogofilter ate 3/5 | Date | Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:35:31 -0400 |
| |
From: Chase Venters [mailto:chase.venters@clientec.com] > highly ironic that spam blocker services tell you not to use certain > techniques (autoresponders, bounce messages) that are not only > commonplace, but precedented and even mandated by RFC on the > grounds that > they may cause you to be blocked. Then they move on to > criticize anti-spam > techniques that fall in these domains with one of their > subpoints saying > 'they can cause you to miss legitimate mail!' > > Guess what: so does indiscriminately blocking people whose > sites don't bow > down to your unreasonable demands, especially when their > behavior (say, > sending bounce messages) is described in the official protocol > documentation.
I will assume you are referring to SpamCop. Their service does not behave the way you think it does: http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?autocom=custom&page=whatis Read the paragraph: "SpamCop works exactly like the credit reporting agencies..."
..Stu
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |