Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:38:48 +0530 | From | Balbir Singh <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory) |
| |
Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 00:47 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > <snip> >> Some not quite so urgent ones - like support for guarantees. I think this can > > IMO, guarantee support should be considered to be part of the > infrastructure. Controller functionalities/implementation will be > different with/without guarantee support. In other words, adding > guarantee feature later will cause re-implementations.
Thanks for pointing this out. Thats what I implied in the comment below.
> >> be worked out as we make progress. >> >>> I agree with these requirements and lets move into this direction. >>> But moving so far can't be done without accepting: >>> 1. core functionality >>> 2. accounting >>> >> Some of the core functionality might be a limiting factor for the requirements. >> Lets agree on the requirements, I think its a great step forward and then >> build the core functionality with these requirements in mind. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Kirill >>>
--
Balbir Singh, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |