[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 00:47 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:

> Some not quite so urgent ones - like support for guarantees. I think this can

IMO, guarantee support should be considered to be part of the
infrastructure. Controller functionalities/implementation will be
different with/without guarantee support. In other words, adding
guarantee feature later will cause re-implementations.

> be worked out as we make progress.
> > I agree with these requirements and lets move into this direction.
> > But moving so far can't be done without accepting:
> > 1. core functionality
> > 2. accounting
> >
> Some of the core functionality might be a limiting factor for the requirements.
> Lets agree on the requirements, I think its a great step forward and then
> build the core functionality with these requirements in mind.
> > Thanks,
> > Kirill
> >

Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- | may get it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-07 00:09    [W:0.141 / U:4.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site