[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] take 4 Re: VIA IRQ quirk, another (embarrassing) suggestion.
Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 11:13 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 11:33 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:54:07PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>>>>> I don't know if this is a real question. Have we VIA products on PCI
>>>>> card, running on not VIA chip sets ?
>>>> Yes. Certainly for on-board devices too.
>>> OK , other argument.
>>> We have billions of VIA chip sets with VIA PCI on-board and
>>> VIA PCI on others chip sets, if exists, are a very few.
>>> So, because some exceptions, we shouldn't stop a resolution of a very
>>> large % of the cases.
>> No thanks. As VIA SATA maintainer, I like being able to use my VIA SATA
>> PCI card.
>> Jeff
> I have 2 computer with 2 different Asrock
> ( boards, both have a
> VIA8237 and a VIA SATA, and both are quirked wrongly, when I use kernels
> 2.6.17+ .
> And if I haven't bought this 2 computers in a supermarket, I won't be
> here discussion this subjects.
> So I like to remember
> ( that confirm a VIA SATA on XT-PIC
> mode ) )
> So VIA SATA needs my patch or Daniel Drake patch to _WORK_ .

No argument.

I'm just saying that you cannot avoid the VIA-device-not-on-VIA-chipset
case. I don't care which patch is used, as long as _both_ cases work.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-06 03:51    [W:0.034 / U:1.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site