Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:10:10 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected |
| |
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:27:08AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:23 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > >> This information confuses me. These places are not supposed to be the > >> ones where the locks were actually acquired, are they? > > > > they should be yes > > (but inlined functions get the name of the function they are inlined > > into) > > Was there function inlining performed? E.g. on those functions that are > called from only one place?
If a static function has only one caller it gets inlined.
> Stefan Richter
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |