[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:27:08AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:23 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> >> This information confuses me. These places are not supposed to be the
> >> ones where the locks were actually acquired, are they?
> >
> > they should be yes
> > (but inlined functions get the name of the function they are inlined
> > into)
> Was there function inlining performed? E.g. on those functions that are
> called from only one place?

If a static function has only one caller it gets inlined.

> Stefan Richter



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-06 02:13    [W:0.035 / U:34.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site