[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: pci error recovery procedure
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:32:08AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> Is it the exclusive reason to have multi-steps?

I don't understand the question. A previous email explained the reason
to have mutiple steps.

> 1) Here link reset and hard reset are hardware operations, not the
> link_reset and slot_reset callback in pci_error_handlers.

I don't understand the comment.

> 2) Callback error_detected will notify drivers there is PCI errors. Drivers
> shouldn't do any I/O in error_detected.

It shouldn't matter. If it is truly important for a particular platform
to make sure that there is no i/o, then the low-level i/o routines
could be modified to drop any accidentally issued i/o on the floor.
This doesn't require a change to either the API or the policy.

> 3) If both the link and slot are reset after all error_detected are called,
> the device should go back to initial status and all DMA should be stopped
> automatically. Why does the driver still need a chance to stop DMA?

As explained previously, not all drivers may want to have a full
electrical device reset.

> The
> error_detected of the drivers in the latest kernel who support err handlers
> always returns PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET. They are typical examples.

Just because the current drivers do it this way does not mean that this is
the best way to do things. A full reset is time-consuming. Some drivers
may want to implement a faster and quicker reset.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-05 21:07    [W:0.040 / U:31.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site