lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: VFAT truncate performance
From
Date
Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr> writes:

> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:52, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > extending files by ftruncate(2) runs very slow on VFAT file
> > systems. On my USB harddisk w/ VFAT, it takes 14 seconds to extend an
> > empty file to 1 GB. On a memory stick, it takes well over 4 minutes.
> >
> > My question is: is this problem on the conceptual level (ie there is
> > no way of extending files on FAT that doesn't involve many disk
> > operations) or is the current Linux fs driver suboptimal in this
> > respect?
> >
> > The reason for asking is that I run Samba which service files on USB
> > devices (w/ VFAT for portability) to Windows XP clients. When copying
> > files to the Samba server, Microsoft SMB clients seem to extend the
> > file before actually starting to copy the data. This results in
> > sluggishness and timeouts when copying large files to VFAT
> > filesystems.
>
> Is your USB stick mounted -o sync ? If that's the case, the truncate()
> and write() won't be merged so they will take twice as long. -o sync
> generally kills performance on USB sticks.
>

No, 'async'.

Regards,
Mattias

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-05 17:41    [W:0.026 / U:1.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site