[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Re: [PATCH 00/22][RFC] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:01:41PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 9/3/06, Josef Sipek <> wrote:
> >I think you misunderstood my comment. What I meant to say was that there is
> >_no way_ you can compile a filesystem that has only dentry ops but not
> >superblock ops - this would happen if you tried to bisect and you landed
> >half way in the series of commits for the filesystem. For the _initial_
> >commit one cset makes sense. For subsequent fixes one commit per fix is the
> >only logical thing to do.
> Reorder the patches so that Makefile and Kconfig changes come last and
> git bisect will work just fine.

Already done.

Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.

Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by
definition, not smart enough to debug it.
- Brian W. Kernighan
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-05 01:37    [W:0.067 / U:9.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site