Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Torokhov <> | Subject | Re: appletouch vs. usbhid | Date | Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:17:39 -0400 |
| |
Hi Pete,
On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:20, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Dear Dmitry: > > A user filed a bug here which seems to indicate that hid lacks needed > exclusions for Apple pointers: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208721 > Do you think we should be adding QUIRK_IGNORE for these?
Yes, I think we should.
> Perhaps conditional on CONFIG_USB_APPLETOUCH?
No, I think we should just do that unconditionally and have users select appletouch driver.
> > We used to have those IGNORE quirks for Wacom, but then started to ignore > all Wacoms. We seem to be not at that point with Apple yet, and also they > have varying vendor IDs. >
Ping Cheng swore that Wacom never produced HID-compiant device and that it would be easier for her if we blacklisted Wacom as vendor in HID...
-- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |