lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: appletouch vs. usbhid
Date
Hi Pete,

On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:20, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Dear Dmitry:
>
> A user filed a bug here which seems to indicate that hid lacks needed
> exclusions for Apple pointers:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208721
> Do you think we should be adding QUIRK_IGNORE for these?

Yes, I think we should.

> Perhaps conditional on CONFIG_USB_APPLETOUCH?

No, I think we should just do that unconditionally and have users select
appletouch driver.

>
> We used to have those IGNORE quirks for Wacom, but then started to ignore
> all Wacoms. We seem to be not at that point with Apple yet, and also they
> have varying vendor IDs.
>

Ping Cheng swore that Wacom never produced HID-compiant device and that
it would be easier for her if we blacklisted Wacom as vendor in HID...

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-01 04:23    [W:0.117 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site