[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GPLv3 Position Statement

    >> >The last Q. is how good is the almost forgotten Hurd kernel?
    >> Wild guess: At most on par with Minix.
    >...and here's a thing that most people forget: good code simply doesn't
    >care about ideology, and ideology often does the wrong technical decisions
    >because it's not about practical issues.
    >The watch-word in Linux development has been "pragmatism". That's probably
    >part of what drives the FSF wild about Linux in the first place. I care
    >about _practical_ issues, not about wild goose chases.
    >If I weren't into computers, I'd be in science. And the rules in science
    >are the same: you simply can't do good science if you start with an
    >agenda. If you say that you'll never touch high-energy physics because
    >you find the atom bomb to be morally reprehensible, that's your right, but
    >you have to also realize that then you can never actually understand the
    >world, and do everything you may need to do.
    >In many ways, the GPLv3 is about "religion". They limit the technology

    Oops, I think we misunderstand each other right now. I took the above question
    as how functional (=good) is Hurd. I did not mean to talk about licensing here.

    Jan Engelhardt
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-28 10:23    [W:0.020 / U:20.724 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site