[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GPLv3 Position Statement
    Linus Torvalds <> writes:

    > But the whole point was to just show how silly the whole "upgradable" vs
    > "not upgradable" discussion is. We're literally talking about something
    > where apparently it matters to the GPLv3 whether a pin on a chip is
    > connected to software or hardware (or not at all). Is that sane?

    I admit I haven't read the last GPLv3 draft, but for me the "freedom"
    (=> benefit) is not the ability to alter software in some specific
    existing device, but rather to take the software, perhaps modify it
    and use in _my_ hardware device.

    I can't use a modified kernel with their TIVO platform? No problem,
    Chinese can make a better one, or maybe some mini ITX board from
    VIA would do.

    Though I think "upgrading" engine settings of my car could be nice,
    never had time to look at it :-)
    Krzysztof Halasa
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-27 23:03    [W:0.027 / U:50.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site