Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Message signaled irq handling cleanups | Date | Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:29:33 -0600 |
| |
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> The following patch set should be enough to clear up the > outstanding issues with genirq on i386 and x86_64. This actually > takes things a step farther and moves all of architecture > dependencies I could find into the appropriate architecture. > > So hopefully we are finally close enough that other architectures > will be able implement msi support, without too much trouble. > > msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code. > msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts > msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code. > msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64 > htirq: Tidy up the htirq code > > Eric
Grr.. My ia64 compiler is way too slow. It just told me I had some trivial bugs in the altix portion of what I posted. Sorry I forgot to mention all I can do is compile test ia64.
So here comes a second time with code that actually compiles :)
Darn this code that is so ugly that you have to test the cleanup on multiple architectures!
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |