lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] Message signaled irq handling cleanups
Date
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> The following patch set should be enough to clear up the
> outstanding issues with genirq on i386 and x86_64. This actually
> takes things a step farther and moves all of architecture
> dependencies I could find into the appropriate architecture.
>
> So hopefully we are finally close enough that other architectures
> will be able implement msi support, without too much trouble.
>
> msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code.
> msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts
> msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code.
> msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64
> htirq: Tidy up the htirq code
>
> Eric

Grr.. My ia64 compiler is way too slow. It just told me I had some
trivial bugs in the altix portion of what I posted. Sorry I forgot
to mention all I can do is compile test ia64.

So here comes a second time with code that actually compiles :)

Darn this code that is so ugly that you have to test the cleanup on
multiple architectures!

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-27 22:33    [W:0.909 / U:1.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site