Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:01:23 +0200 | From | Haavard Skinnemoen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction |
| |
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:14:17 +0100 Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:51:45PM +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > Another thing: Andrew, are you the official maintainer of this > > driver? If not, who is? > > I've not heard from Andrew, so I'm not sure what to do about this. I > think these changes need validating by someone with the existing > driver's hardware (iow, AT91RM9200 and/or AT91SAM9261) so we can be > sure we don't break that support.
I really want at least the first one to go in, as the new AVR32 port would soon find itself without a serial driver otherwise. And it doesn't make any actual changes for the CONFIG_ARM case, so it should be quite safe. The last two are bugfixes which I believe make sense on ARM as well, but that's also a reason why they should be more thoroughly tested.
I can resend them as individual patches if it helps make it more clear that they don't really depend on each other.
I have a AT91RM9200-EK board lying around, so I might be able to test the patches on that as soon as I get the necessary cross compilers and other tools set up.
Haavard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |