lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:29:21PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> NOTE: Your mailer generates bogus Mail-Followup-To headers, and you
> snipped rmk from the To/CC.

Hmm, curious. I'll file a bug.

> > Has Andrew commented on why this is proving to be more of a problem?
> > I've done regular rebases of cpufreq/agpgart (admittedly, they don't
> > reject hardly ever unless Len has ACPI bits touching cpufreq) without
> > causing too much headache.
>
> Rebasing _inevitably_ causes more headaches than a simple tree update,
> for any downstream consumer of your tree(s). It is best to avoid wanton
> rebasing.

Sorry, terminology confusion. I rarely throw away a tree and start afresh,
I meant of course just updating to linus' latest. This may explain the
my lack of understanding over Russell's issues.

Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-22 19:13    [W:0.219 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site