Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:09:09 -0400 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans |
| |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:29:21PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > NOTE: Your mailer generates bogus Mail-Followup-To headers, and you > snipped rmk from the To/CC.
Hmm, curious. I'll file a bug.
> > Has Andrew commented on why this is proving to be more of a problem? > > I've done regular rebases of cpufreq/agpgart (admittedly, they don't > > reject hardly ever unless Len has ACPI bits touching cpufreq) without > > causing too much headache. > > Rebasing _inevitably_ causes more headaches than a simple tree update, > for any downstream consumer of your tree(s). It is best to avoid wanton > rebasing.
Sorry, terminology confusion. I rarely throw away a tree and start afresh, I meant of course just updating to linus' latest. This may explain the my lack of understanding over Russell's issues.
Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |