[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
    On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Dave Jones wrote:

    > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:00:48PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
    > > for the tarball users they would have to grab
    > > multiple patches to get from the last thing that they have to whatever is
    > > current.
    > ketchup solves that problem. One command brings any tree up to current.

    so are you saying that ketchup should be used for _all_ access to the vanilla
    tree that isn't done via git?

    if not then tarballs still have a place.

    and how does ketchup deal with patched trees to start with?

    > > also people could be behind a firewall that prevents git from working properly,
    > > for them tarballs and patches are the right way of doing things.
    > If they can't git through a firewall, they won't be able to wget a tarball through
    > it either.

    to work properly git should talk it's own protocol, http/ftp can be allowed (and
    authenticated) through firewalls that don't allow the git protocol.

    David Lang

    > Dave
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-22 00:31    [W:0.021 / U:80.860 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site