Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:32:26 +0530 | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction |
| |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:27:34PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: > For other resources, such as CPU cycles and network bandwidth, unless > another bright spark comes up with an insight, I don't see how to > express the "percentage used" semantics provided by something such > as CKRM, using anything resembling cpusets.
How abt metered cpusets? Each child cpuset of a metered cpuset represents a fraction of CPU time alloted to the tasks of the child cpuset.
> ... Can one imagine having the scheduler subdivide each second of > time available on a CPU into several fake-CPUs, each one of which > speaks for one of those sub-second fake-CPU slices? Sounds too > weird to me, and a bit too rigid to be a servicable CKRM substitute.
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |