Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:39:27 +0800 | From | Akinobu Mita <> | Subject | Re: [patch 8/8] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities |
| |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:35:27AM -0700, Don Mullis wrote: > There's no problem with hiding per se, but rather with the indentation > level. It's most natural for the user to have dependent options > indented under their "parent". For an example, in "menuconfig" try > setting "Compile the kernel with frame unwind information"; > notice that "Stack unwind support" appears immediately underneath > it, indented. The indentation reminds the user why "Stack unwind > support" has appeared. >
I see.
> Note that several of the pre-existing, non-fault-injection options > under "Kernel debugging", are also broken in this way.
Perhaps you can move UNWIND_INFO, STACK_UNWIND, and DEBUG_FS entries ealier in the list. It improves improve appearance for other DEBUG_KERNEL dependent config options like (DEBUG_VM, FRAME_POINTER, ...).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |