Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:09:22 -0700 | From | "Paul Menage" <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction |
| |
On 9/20/06, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote: > > Yes. There's quite a bit more to cpusets than just some form, > any form, of CPU and Memory restriction. I can't imagine that > Containers, in any form, are going to replicate that API. >
That would be one of the nice aspects of a generic process container abstraction linked to different resource controllers - you wouldn't need to replicate the cpuset support, you could use it in parallel with other resource controllers. (So e.g. use the cpusets support to pin a group of processes on to a given set of CPU/memory nodes, and then use the CKRM/RG CPU and disk/IO controllers to limit resource usage within those nodes)
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |