Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction | From | Rohit Seth <> | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:50:57 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 03:00 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > (this time to the lists as well) > > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > I'd much rather containterize the whole reclaim code, which should not > > be too hard since he already adds a container pointer to struct page. > >
Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code.
> > I still have to reread what Rohit does for file backed pages, that gave > > my head a spin.
Please let me know if there is any specific part that isn't making much sense.
-rohit
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |