[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
    On 9/20/06, Christoph Lameter <> wrote:
    > I think we should have one container mechanism instead of multiple. Maybe
    > merge the two? The cpuset functionality is well established and working
    > right.

    The basic container abstraction provided by cpusets is very nice -
    maybe rename it from "cpuset" to "container"? Since it already
    provides access to memory nodes as well as cpus, and could be extended
    to handle other resource types too (network, disk).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-20 19:45    [W:0.024 / U:0.960 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site