lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers

    * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

    > > +choice
    > > + prompt "MARK code marker behavior"
    >
    > > +config MARK_KPROBE
    > > +config MARK_JPROBE
    > > +config MARK_FPROBE
    > > + Change markers for a function call.
    > > +config MARK_PRINT
    >
    > as indicated before in great detail, NACK on this profileration of
    > marker options, especially the function call one. I'd like to see _one_
    > marker mechanism that distros could enable, preferably with zero (or at
    > most one NOP) in-code overhead. (You can of course patch whatever
    > extension ontop of it, in out-of-tree code, to gain further performance
    > advantage by generating direct system-calls.)
    ^---function

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-19 10:25    [W:0.023 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site