[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 12:56 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> <snip>
>> The same for the limiting - either do not start new container, or
>> recalculate limits to meet new requirements. You may not take care of
>> guarantees as weel and create an overcommited configuration.
>> And one more thing. We've asked it many times and I ask it again -
>> please, show us the other way for providing guarantee rather than
>> limiting or reserving.
> Why do we want the capability to be snipped at the infrastructure level.
> Let the controller writers decide how they want to provide the
> capability and the users to decide if they want to use the feature at a
> price.

That's what we proposed in the very beginning - to review an infrastructure
with minimal functionality (limiting) and develop new features after the
is accepted.

I'm glad that we've finaly made a bargain :)

>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>> _______________________________________________
>> ckrm-tech mailing list

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-19 10:07    [W:0.127 / U:1.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site